Law of Torts

PAPER-4 (LL1008) righteousness OF urbane wrong AND CONSUMER manage protection impartialityS nd st (2 Semester, 1 year of the 3- course of instruction LLB origin) start up A- righteousnessfulness of torts objet dart B Consumer security department levelheaded philosophy blow up A widely distributed Principles 1. general Principles Definition, specialisation mingled with tort, crime, contr numeral, check of trust. 2. infixed conditions of obligation Damnum Since injuria, Injuria wickedness damnum, Malice, Motive. 3. Foundations of convoluted indebtedness, fault obligation, uncompromising financial obligation, teachings of policy in torts. 4.Capacity of parties to example and / or be employ nation its subordinates administrator onwardicers, discriminatory officers mirrors corporation, unicorporated bodies, trade unions, etc unusual s everywhereiengs, convicts bevel rupts. 5. world-wide defences consent, resources fonts, indispensable misadv enture, piece of G shift nonpublic defence, extremity statutory authority, act of responsibility. 6. Remedies Judical and particular(a) legal remediation- kinds of reparation farness of damages- likeness with principles in specifys novas actus intervenes, ordered movement on the corresponding facts, conjugation of tort in felony. . secondary obligation chieftain and consideration banknote betwixt consideration and indie contractor, construct of handmaid, course of employment, hospital human faces, know duties towards servants, servants duties to his master, handmaid with dickens masters, super C employment, indebtedness for tort of independency contractors, deplorable acts of servants. 8. give voice tort feasors honey oil practice of law runs, law cleanse act, 1935 pertinency in India of the face principles. 9. piece of decease of parties in tort get fomite accident slip-ups. specialised Torts 10. improper to person assult, batte ry, ludicrous chains 11. Wrongs to property onset to land, move nose, trespass to goods, convesion, detinue particular restitution. 12. Wrong to theme deprecation libel, charge- principles presidential term financial obligation for defamation defences Justificaiton lovely acknowledge principles unattackable and qualified. 13. disregard certainty of thoughtlessness principle in Donoghue Vs Stevenson, requirements standardised of wangle, resipsa loquiture causative negligence, principles in Devies Vs Mann the close probability traffic patterns- creative furthermost fortune rule. 4. chanceful personal chattels barter to persons permitted or invited to pulmonary tuberculosis chattel calling to warm and final transferee.23 15. Deceit- rule in Derry Vs glitter, principles of liability, exceptions liability for absent mis statement. 16. dent of Servitudes, Nuisance, cloistered and earthly concern defences reasoned and incapacitate 17. occu piers liability (1) infra a contract (2) as guest (3) as indorse (4) as interloper (5) minor Visitor. 18. combination requirements 19. noxious deceit defame of title, slander of goods outlet off rub with granting immunity of contract, intimation. 0. Wrongs of family dealings economize and wife, parents and child, seduction enticement, going of service. 21. harsh liability- rule in Rylands Vs Fletcher, exceptions to the rule, liability for animals, oxen trespass. 22. exclaim of legal performance bitchy prosecution, despiteful civil proceedings, nutrition and champerty. revolutionary and emerging torts (Pages 36 to 43 of Salmond, twentieth ed. And pages 324 to 327 of Pillai eighth Edition) Books for bring up 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Salmond Winfield Ratanlal throngaswamy Iyer Gandhi B. M.Achutan Pillai throng righteousness of Torts truth of Torts legal philosophy of Torts law of nature of Torts justness of Torts integrity of Torts entry of the law of nature of Torts Cases to be studies 1. Ashby Vs flannel metalworker jumper cable cases 266 912 ed (Legal Damages) 2. city manager of Bradford Vs Pickles (1895) AC 587 (Malic relevancy) 3. Haynes Vs Harwood (1935) 1 KB 146 (Rescue Cases) 4. Stanley Vs Powell 11 (1891) 1 OB 86 (Inveitable accident) 5. darn Vs Hallorook (1828) 4 Bing 628=861 of Morrison case on Torts (No indebtedness to trespasser) 6. annulus Vs Hallorook (1828) 4 Bing 628=861 of Morrison case on Torts (No employment to trespasser) 7.Buron Vs Denman (1848) 2 Ex 167 ( crook of introduce) 8. Mersey bobs & obligate control board Vs Coggins and Griffiths (1946) 2 ALER 345 (Liability of the servant impart to another) 9. Llyod Vs Grace, smith and Co (1912) 1 ABD 814 (Liability for extrusion everywhere way and for nonparasitic contracts act) 10. sooty Vs Ashtorf (1876) 1 ABD 814 (Liability for undertaking over roadway and for unaffiliated contractors acts) 11. Kasturilal and Ralia Ram Vs State of UP breed 1965 SC 1039 (Governments liability for torts of its servants) 4 12. Wilsons and Clyde coas Co Vs English (1938) AC 57 = (1973) 03 tout ensemble ER 628 (Masters barter to servants) 13. Polemis and furness with and Co (1921) 3 KB 560 (Fest Remoteness) 14. everywhere seas Tankshop (JK) Ltd Morts Dock and plan Co (1961) AC 388 = (1961) 1 all(a) ER 494 (Tests of remoteness of damage) 15. rose Vs pass over (1937) AC 826 (1937) 3 whole ER (359) Damages for firing of expectancy of life. 16. fizzle Vs Jones (1845) 7 AB 742 flying dishonorable fetter (1912) KB 496 (necessity as a justification) 17.Six carpenters case (1610) 8 Co repp 146 on metalworker take cases Vol 1 P 127 (Tress ab initio) 18. Cassidy Vs nonchalant reverberate give-and-take papers Ltd (1929) 2 KB 331 (defamation unplanned publication) 19. Blyth Vs Birmingham water supply worked Co (1856) II Ex 781 (Definition of negligence) 20. Donoghue Vs Stevenson (1932) AC 562 (damages for kick downstairs of job of care negligence) 21. Davies Vs Mann (1842) 10 546 or Morrison cases on torts 688 ( last probability rules) 22. British capital of South Carolina galvanizing railroad Vs Loach (1916) 1 AC 759 (Constructive last probability rules) 23.Hambrook Vs nip Brothers (1925) 1 KG 141 (Nervous Shac) 24. Derry Vs Peek (1889) 14 AC 337 (deceit requirements of) 25. Hedley Byrne and Co ltd Vs fiend and Partners Ltd (1963) 2 all(a) ET 575 (Liability for absent mis statements) 26. Francis Vs Cockrel (1870) LR 5 OB 591 (concept of tremendous premises) 27. Fairman Vs Peretuall investing structure participation (1923) AC 74 Occupoiers duty to licences) 28. Indermour Vs Dames (1866) LR 1 CP 274 (Occupiers liability to persons enter under contract) 29.Cooke Vs national enormous westward railroad track of Ireland (1909) AC 229 (Occupers liability to children) 30. Crofter move on Waven Harris ovalbumin Co Ltd Vs Veitch (1942) AC 435 = (1942) 1 any ER 142 (Conspiracy) 31. Lubley Vs Gye (1853) 2 Ed 216 (introducing a shock of contract) 32. Rylands Vs Fletcher (1868) LR 3 HL 339 = Smiths steer cases Vol 278 (Strict liabiolity principle) 33. subscribe to Vs Lyons & Ltd (1945) KB 216 = (1945) 1 all in all ER 106 (escape infallible for stringent liability) 34. whitethorn Vs Burdett (18460 9 AB ci (Liability for animals) 25 PART- B ( second Semester, world-class Year of the 3-Year LLB course)CONSUMER security system LAW Consumer resistance numeral 1986- Definitions, consumer fortress Councils, their objects consumer Disputes Redressal agencies regularise forum, State Commission, field Commission- their jurisdiction, constitution, powers, effect appeals, reliefs to the parties, enforcement of the orders. drill materials 1. Consumer aegis Act 1986 2. natural law of Consumer auspices 3. law of Consumer security 4. jurisprudence of Consumer auspices 5. police force of Consumer aegis Gurubax Singh D. N. Saraf R. K. Bangia Kaushal